Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Hammer ballistic coefficient tests...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pdvdh" data-source="post: 2613557" data-attributes="member: 4191"><p>Agreed. The cost of a LabRadar is minimal compared to all the other costs associated with bullet manufacturing. It's comes down to a matter of prioritization, and time. </p><p></p><p>If time is the big constraint, Oehler sells equipment to reduce the time required to collect accurate BC values. More expensive than LabRadar, but not bankrupting.</p><p></p><p>Downrange bullet drops is not an accurate method for establishing 'initial' bullet BC values. It's a good last step for refining a bullet's BC value, as fired from a specific barrel.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pdvdh, post: 2613557, member: 4191"] Agreed. The cost of a LabRadar is minimal compared to all the other costs associated with bullet manufacturing. It's comes down to a matter of prioritization, and time. If time is the big constraint, Oehler sells equipment to reduce the time required to collect accurate BC values. More expensive than LabRadar, but not bankrupting. Downrange bullet drops is not an accurate method for establishing 'initial' bullet BC values. It's a good last step for refining a bullet's BC value, as fired from a specific barrel. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Hammer ballistic coefficient tests...
Top