Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Go New Zealand!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MudRunner2005" data-source="post: 1687743" data-attributes="member: 12995"><p>This is why the Democrats in America want to destroy the 2nd Amendment so badly. Because they cannot out-right demand you turn something in without it being considered high-treason against our Constitution and Bill of Rights.</p><p></p><p>This is why most of us have such a big problem with Trump's end-run around Congress with the Bumpstock ban. It had very little to do with the devices themselsves, it had more to do with the ILLEGAL and tyrannical dictator-style method he used to force it on Americans. Bumpstocks are cheap junky pieces of plastic, and at-best are a novelty item for broke rednecks to enjoy SIMULATED full-auto fire. They do not turn a weapon into a machine-gun, in any universe. They do not alter the weapon's primary function in ANY way. When they redefined the definition of a machine-gun (without Congressional approval because the Supreme Court would have shot it down instantly), to include bumpstocks, they opened up a very slippery slope into our aftermarket parts possibly being banned in the future. This is why so many of us are mad. It has nothing to do with the bumpstocks themselves. Plus, most of us KNEW something was off and VERY odd about the whole Vegas shooting incident... None of it still adds up to this day. Which is why I, personally, feel it was sa false-flag by our own government to get us to give up our own rights... Never underestimate the cowardly lows of ANY government on earth, in an attempt to favor more power by voluntary means.</p><p></p><p>Even Benjamin Franklin stated back in the 1700's, that "Those who would give up essential liberties to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty, nor safety."</p><p></p><p>I just wanted to clarify this, because some folks in other countries might not be aware of HOW the ban took place, and WHY so many of us are opposed to it. It's the illegal and underhanded method and manner it was gone about being forced upon us.</p><p></p><p>I don't own one, and never have...No desire to. If I want a full-auto, I'll go through the proper (LEGAL) channels and purchase a VERY expensive transferrable pre-1986 model to add to my collection...Not some junky piece of plastic that anyone could buy for $50.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MudRunner2005, post: 1687743, member: 12995"] This is why the Democrats in America want to destroy the 2nd Amendment so badly. Because they cannot out-right demand you turn something in without it being considered high-treason against our Constitution and Bill of Rights. This is why most of us have such a big problem with Trump's end-run around Congress with the Bumpstock ban. It had very little to do with the devices themselsves, it had more to do with the ILLEGAL and tyrannical dictator-style method he used to force it on Americans. Bumpstocks are cheap junky pieces of plastic, and at-best are a novelty item for broke rednecks to enjoy SIMULATED full-auto fire. They do not turn a weapon into a machine-gun, in any universe. They do not alter the weapon's primary function in ANY way. When they redefined the definition of a machine-gun (without Congressional approval because the Supreme Court would have shot it down instantly), to include bumpstocks, they opened up a very slippery slope into our aftermarket parts possibly being banned in the future. This is why so many of us are mad. It has nothing to do with the bumpstocks themselves. Plus, most of us KNEW something was off and VERY odd about the whole Vegas shooting incident... None of it still adds up to this day. Which is why I, personally, feel it was sa false-flag by our own government to get us to give up our own rights... Never underestimate the cowardly lows of ANY government on earth, in an attempt to favor more power by voluntary means. Even Benjamin Franklin stated back in the 1700's, that "Those who would give up essential liberties to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty, nor safety." I just wanted to clarify this, because some folks in other countries might not be aware of HOW the ban took place, and WHY so many of us are opposed to it. It's the illegal and underhanded method and manner it was gone about being forced upon us. I don't own one, and never have...No desire to. If I want a full-auto, I'll go through the proper (LEGAL) channels and purchase a VERY expensive transferrable pre-1986 model to add to my collection...Not some junky piece of plastic that anyone could buy for $50. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Go New Zealand!
Top