Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
FFP vs SFP Mechanical Durability
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Paladin300" data-source="post: 2758119" data-attributes="member: 115299"><p>This is an interesting question? I am a fan of FFP. I don't really see where there would be a difference in quality or durability from one to the other. They are built the same. The only difference being where the reticle is located and with reticles being etched in the lens now I can't see where it would matter. I don't know why? But for some reason in my mind I always assumed, even though they cost more, that FFP was the simpler system to build. A more natural approach. I don't, from a technical stand point think there is a difference in reliability. I think it has more to do with overall build quality. If we are talking TT, ZCO, S&B, March, NF, Kahles, IOR, Leupold MK5, VX5/6? I don't think you will find or see a difference. However, I could be wrong. It wouldn't be the first time nor the last.<img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😁" title="Beaming face with smiling eyes :grin:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f601.png" data-shortname=":grin:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Paladin300, post: 2758119, member: 115299"] This is an interesting question? I am a fan of FFP. I don’t really see where there would be a difference in quality or durability from one to the other. They are built the same. The only difference being where the reticle is located and with reticles being etched in the lens now I can’t see where it would matter. I don’t know why? But for some reason in my mind I always assumed, even though they cost more, that FFP was the simpler system to build. A more natural approach. I don’t, from a technical stand point think there is a difference in reliability. I think it has more to do with overall build quality. If we are talking TT, ZCO, S&B, March, NF, Kahles, IOR, Leupold MK5, VX5/6? I don’t think you will find or see a difference. However, I could be wrong. It wouldn’t be the first time nor the last.😁 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
FFP vs SFP Mechanical Durability
Top