Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Does it pay to go to Ackley improved in a short barrel?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elkaholic" data-source="post: 1267241" data-attributes="member: 13833"><p>Most 280's had 22" barrels, so I would say yes to getting at least most of velocity back, if not all of it. I also agree with Jerry that efficiency and brass life are major benefits, and would even add a little barrel life with the 40 degree shoulder directing the flame point a lot better than the 17 1/2........Rich</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elkaholic, post: 1267241, member: 13833"] Most 280's had 22" barrels, so I would say yes to getting at least most of velocity back, if not all of it. I also agree with Jerry that efficiency and brass life are major benefits, and would even add a little barrel life with the 40 degree shoulder directing the flame point a lot better than the 17 1/2........Rich [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Does it pay to go to Ackley improved in a short barrel?
Top