Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Regional Forums
West
Disappointed in non-resident hunters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="southpa" data-source="post: 3087099" data-attributes="member: 65823"><p>How is floating 50% of the departments annual revenue a "drop in the bucket"? Take that away and it cuts the departments revenue in half. The property taxes and groceries and land purchases made by residents are rather moot to the point being made. I'd venture to guess non of that offers any percentage to the fish and game department. And if it does, it would be a drop in the bucket compared to what NRs fund for fish and game in anyone's home state.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="southpa, post: 3087099, member: 65823"] How is floating 50% of the departments annual revenue a "drop in the bucket"? Take that away and it cuts the departments revenue in half. The property taxes and groceries and land purchases made by residents are rather moot to the point being made. I'd venture to guess non of that offers any percentage to the fish and game department. And if it does, it would be a drop in the bucket compared to what NRs fund for fish and game in anyone's home state. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Regional Forums
West
Disappointed in non-resident hunters
Top