Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Burris Fulfield 2 vs. Nikon Buckmaster
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rscott5028" data-source="post: 500202" data-attributes="member: 24624"><p>I wouldn't rank my Nikon quite as high as my Leupolds. The glass and warranty/service is a notch above. </p><p> </p><p>But, the Nikon is a good value and if you don't hit what you're aiming at, it's probably not the scope's fault. </p><p> </p><p>Again, I can't speak to the Burris since I don't own any at this time. </p><p> </p><p>JMHO</p><p>richard</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rscott5028, post: 500202, member: 24624"] I wouldn't rank my Nikon quite as high as my Leupolds. The glass and warranty/service is a notch above. But, the Nikon is a good value and if you don't hit what you're aiming at, it's probably not the scope's fault. Again, I can't speak to the Burris since I don't own any at this time. JMHO richard [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Burris Fulfield 2 vs. Nikon Buckmaster
Top