Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Bumpstocks banned
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MudRunner2005" data-source="post: 1532296" data-attributes="member: 12995"><p>If you understood what the legal definition of a machine gun is, then you would know that a bumpstock does <strong>NOT</strong> fall under that legal definition set-forth and agreed-upon by Congress.</p><p></p><p>I've said it 100 times, that I don't own one, never have, and never will... They're cheap plastic junk. But it's the principle of this thing that is setting forth a terrible precedent. If it was JUST banning bumpstocks in general, that's fine. But they're demanding confiscation and destruction of personal property without compensation, which is 100% ILLEGAL! Also, and maybe even more scary, they're redefining the LEGAL DEFINITION of what a machine gun is. And this is NOT ok. Because it leads down a very scary and slippery slope to full-on semi-auto ban and confiscation...You know, without compensation, representation, or the ATF's fear of reprimandation with the full-authority of the President behind them, because that's how we now do things here in America... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite11" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll Eyes :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /></p><p></p><p>Also, the BATFE is an ENFORCEMENT agency...They are not a judicial or law making authority. When you give them that power, that further infringes on the entire justice system that we have in place.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MudRunner2005, post: 1532296, member: 12995"] If you understood what the legal definition of a machine gun is, then you would know that a bumpstock does [B]NOT[/B] fall under that legal definition set-forth and agreed-upon by Congress. I've said it 100 times, that I don't own one, never have, and never will... They're cheap plastic junk. But it's the principle of this thing that is setting forth a terrible precedent. If it was JUST banning bumpstocks in general, that's fine. But they're demanding confiscation and destruction of personal property without compensation, which is 100% ILLEGAL! Also, and maybe even more scary, they're redefining the LEGAL DEFINITION of what a machine gun is. And this is NOT ok. Because it leads down a very scary and slippery slope to full-on semi-auto ban and confiscation...You know, without compensation, representation, or the ATF's fear of reprimandation with the full-authority of the President behind them, because that's how we now do things here in America... :rolleyes: Also, the BATFE is an ENFORCEMENT agency...They are not a judicial or law making authority. When you give them that power, that further infringes on the entire justice system that we have in place. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Bumpstocks banned
Top