Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Blaser r93 - is it accurate. Did it deserve the "Rifle of the Century"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aussie" data-source="post: 61539" data-attributes="member: 2447"><p><strong>Re: Blaser r93 - is it accurate. Did it deserve the \"Rifle of the Century\"</strong></p><p></p><p>davyd ,</p><p>The Blasers cost a packet . You could keep your Remington (which is a "known quantity" in terms of accuracy) and buy a Sako (the pick of sporters IMHO) or two for the price of a Blaser . </p><p>Having one rifle and one scope sounds great but you'll find the need to resight the rifle every time you change barrels will be a pain in the guts . </p><p>Keep your "specialist varmint rifle" and buy yourself an accurate sporter if you want something more portable . Having had both light and heavy varmint rifles I can tell you it is a lot easier to shoot a heavy rifle accurately over a rest than it is a sporter . There's a case for having one (or more ) of each . </p><p>I had a switch barrel set up for a while and wouldn't go back that way unless I was going on an overseas safari and wanted to save luggage space .</p><p>If I haven't convinced you then perhaps you should check out an SHR or Schultz and Larsen . Blasers don't seem too popular here . /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aussie, post: 61539, member: 2447"] [b]Re: Blaser r93 - is it accurate. Did it deserve the \"Rifle of the Century\"[/b] davyd , The Blasers cost a packet . You could keep your Remington (which is a "known quantity" in terms of accuracy) and buy a Sako (the pick of sporters IMHO) or two for the price of a Blaser . Having one rifle and one scope sounds great but you'll find the need to resight the rifle every time you change barrels will be a pain in the guts . Keep your "specialist varmint rifle" and buy yourself an accurate sporter if you want something more portable . Having had both light and heavy varmint rifles I can tell you it is a lot easier to shoot a heavy rifle accurately over a rest than it is a sporter . There's a case for having one (or more ) of each . I had a switch barrel set up for a while and wouldn't go back that way unless I was going on an overseas safari and wanted to save luggage space . If I haven't convinced you then perhaps you should check out an SHR or Schultz and Larsen . Blasers don't seem too popular here . [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Blaser r93 - is it accurate. Did it deserve the "Rifle of the Century"
Top