Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Better Groups At Distance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 2805791" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p>When terms like 'impossible', or 'physics', or 'proof' are cast, it sabotages the search for truths.</p><p>One scenario is not proof of all.</p><p>A common notion means nothing of possible.</p><p>And physics in this matter is far broader than considered with highly limited shoot through testing.</p><p></p><p>So while this alludes us, soft opinions are actually more valuable to consider than rigid declarations.</p><p>Personally, I'd like the answer, and could care less about results of a $1,000 publicity stunt.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 2805791, member: 1521"] When terms like 'impossible', or 'physics', or 'proof' are cast, it sabotages the search for truths. One scenario is not proof of all. A common notion means nothing of possible. And physics in this matter is far broader than considered with highly limited shoot through testing. So while this alludes us, soft opinions are actually more valuable to consider than rigid declarations. Personally, I'd like the answer, and could care less about results of a $1,000 publicity stunt. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Better Groups At Distance
Top