Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Bear Hunting
Bear load info for 300WSM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zerk" data-source="post: 1326547" data-attributes="member: 84595"><p>I think many rifles and loads will work for lung shots. But if you want to shoot it in the shoulder and drop it, there may a difference with penetration of different rounds.</p><p></p><p>The hornady RN is bascially a corloct or partion, I believe. I bought some but havn't loaded. I used the Hornady spitzer last year on a deer. I think the debate would be same as corloct RN vs SP.</p><p></p><p>I used always use RN. Coefficient is less. But I shot at 30-50 yards. Is the expansion that much better than a pointed? I am curious, but suspect it is an old debate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zerk, post: 1326547, member: 84595"] I think many rifles and loads will work for lung shots. But if you want to shoot it in the shoulder and drop it, there may a difference with penetration of different rounds. The hornady RN is bascially a corloct or partion, I believe. I bought some but havn't loaded. I used the Hornady spitzer last year on a deer. I think the debate would be same as corloct RN vs SP. I used always use RN. Coefficient is less. But I shot at 30-50 yards. Is the expansion that much better than a pointed? I am curious, but suspect it is an old debate. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Bear Hunting
Bear load info for 300WSM
Top