Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Elk Hunting
Are the Eld x bullets that bad
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BuckeyeRifleman" data-source="post: 2857657" data-attributes="member: 110280"><p>I think it's important to remember that bullets ultimately kill via two methods, massive blood loss via hemorrhage from vital organs, or CNS disruption.</p><p></p><p>No doubt any legal caliber and any bullet can cause that to happen. As such there is a lot of confirmation bias that if a bullet worked for them in a handful of scenarios it must also work for everyone in every scenario.</p><p></p><p>There are some traditional metrics of good bullet performance that are commonly accepted across both big game uses and law enforcement and personal defense uses.</p><p></p><p>Reliable straight line penetration, enough to reach vitals from oblique angles. As such mass retention and the ability for the case and jacket to remain together has been traditionally regarded as important in this regard.</p><p></p><p>Reliable expansion that will cause a large enough permanent wound cavity to cause massive hemorrhage.</p><p></p><p>There is a lot of marketing in the bullet would. A lot of cool sounding terms like "shock" and "energy" used to wow buyers and sell bullets.</p><p></p><p>But ultimately, that massive hemorrhage is what turns the lights out on a critter in the typical hunting scenario.</p><p></p><p>Some bullets do that better than others. Some do it better up close and some do it better far away, and it's really hard to find a bullet that does it all the time in every possible scenario.</p><p></p><p>Do your research, do your best to separate the marketing from the reality. Try to find the "no BS" gel tests and find what works in your caliber and from what distances (impact velocity) you expect to engage from.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BuckeyeRifleman, post: 2857657, member: 110280"] I think it’s important to remember that bullets ultimately kill via two methods, massive blood loss via hemorrhage from vital organs, or CNS disruption. No doubt any legal caliber and any bullet can cause that to happen. As such there is a lot of confirmation bias that if a bullet worked for them in a handful of scenarios it must also work for everyone in every scenario. There are some traditional metrics of good bullet performance that are commonly accepted across both big game uses and law enforcement and personal defense uses. Reliable straight line penetration, enough to reach vitals from oblique angles. As such mass retention and the ability for the case and jacket to remain together has been traditionally regarded as important in this regard. Reliable expansion that will cause a large enough permanent wound cavity to cause massive hemorrhage. There is a lot of marketing in the bullet would. A lot of cool sounding terms like “shock” and “energy” used to wow buyers and sell bullets. But ultimately, that massive hemorrhage is what turns the lights out on a critter in the typical hunting scenario. Some bullets do that better than others. Some do it better up close and some do it better far away, and it’s really hard to find a bullet that does it all the time in every possible scenario. Do your research, do your best to separate the marketing from the reality. Try to find the “no BS” gel tests and find what works in your caliber and from what distances (impact velocity) you expect to engage from. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Elk Hunting
Are the Eld x bullets that bad
Top