Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Absolute Hammer load data
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="just_jon" data-source="post: 3096128" data-attributes="member: 112153"><p>I was thinking 3600 going in, but then N560 was a total shot in the dark. QL is no help with the AH and the only data published here for this combo used RL33 which I would have also thought to be too slow. I looked at the 26 Nosler data for this bullet and they also used typical slow burning magnum powders (7828, RL26, H1000, etc.). Same goes for Hornady data for the 127 Barnes LRX. </p><p></p><p>On the plus side, four of the seven charge weights shot in the .3s with the worst being just under .7. Sort of like kissing your sister.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="just_jon, post: 3096128, member: 112153"] I was thinking 3600 going in, but then N560 was a total shot in the dark. QL is no help with the AH and the only data published here for this combo used RL33 which I would have also thought to be too slow. I looked at the 26 Nosler data for this bullet and they also used typical slow burning magnum powders (7828, RL26, H1000, etc.). Same goes for Hornady data for the 127 Barnes LRX. On the plus side, four of the seven charge weights shot in the .3s with the worst being just under .7. Sort of like kissing your sister. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Absolute Hammer load data
Top