Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Gunsmithing
7saum Reamer Print
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TwoMore" data-source="post: 1338000" data-attributes="member: 95166"><p>I went thru this with my 7WSM,for me what it all boiled down to is what I wanted out of the rifle and which bullet will be the most efficient. I settled in with the 168 vld, it was flatter than the 180 in the range I built it for, lil less recoil. I looked at all the bullets and did the math and even to 1000 yards the 168 looked better than the heavies in that chambering . my reamer is .168 FB for a .250 seated actually it is .240 with the trim at 2.1 inch, my reamer is 2.11. but that being said, it wouldnt bother me at all to seat it out a bit on the rsaum cartridge. that .324 neck length gives you that advantage of looking at different bullets, where I only had .240 to work with. but like I said when I crunched the numbers I went to the 168 and that is my go to hunter.</p><p>Good Luck <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TwoMore, post: 1338000, member: 95166"] I went thru this with my 7WSM,for me what it all boiled down to is what I wanted out of the rifle and which bullet will be the most efficient. I settled in with the 168 vld, it was flatter than the 180 in the range I built it for, lil less recoil. I looked at all the bullets and did the math and even to 1000 yards the 168 looked better than the heavies in that chambering . my reamer is .168 FB for a .250 seated actually it is .240 with the trim at 2.1 inch, my reamer is 2.11. but that being said, it wouldnt bother me at all to seat it out a bit on the rsaum cartridge. that .324 neck length gives you that advantage of looking at different bullets, where I only had .240 to work with. but like I said when I crunched the numbers I went to the 168 and that is my go to hunter. Good Luck :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Gunsmithing
7saum Reamer Print
Top