Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Elk Hunting
6.5 CM, 6.5 PRC Enough/Effective for Elk?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="southpa" data-source="post: 3044422" data-attributes="member: 65823"><p>Again just read post #114. Bigger bullet more energy. I'm honestly not trying to be a jerk but I really don't know how else to spell it out. All a bigger/heavier bullet has to do is leave the darn barrel. Once it's leaves the barrel its carrying more energy then a smaller/lighter bullet. It doesn't matter where it hits or if 1500 pounds of it is in the dirt. It still hit with more energy than a bullet with less energy did. Hahah. This is not rocket surgery. You cannot make something with less weight and energy transfer more weight and energy than something thats has more weight and energy. All of the semantics are not relevant to the point being made. This has been said many times in this thread already. Nobody is advocating that more energy will turn a bad shots good (although it's debatable that the shock will aid in killing a lot faster than a whimpy 6.5 bullet but that is a different debate). You seem to be making that point in defense of the 6.5cm. There's no need to defend your 6.5s if you like them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="southpa, post: 3044422, member: 65823"] Again just read post #114. Bigger bullet more energy. I'm honestly not trying to be a jerk but I really don't know how else to spell it out. All a bigger/heavier bullet has to do is leave the darn barrel. Once it's leaves the barrel its carrying more energy then a smaller/lighter bullet. It doesn't matter where it hits or if 1500 pounds of it is in the dirt. It still hit with more energy than a bullet with less energy did. Hahah. This is not rocket surgery. You cannot make something with less weight and energy transfer more weight and energy than something thats has more weight and energy. All of the semantics are not relevant to the point being made. This has been said many times in this thread already. Nobody is advocating that more energy will turn a bad shots good (although it's debatable that the shock will aid in killing a lot faster than a whimpy 6.5 bullet but that is a different debate). You seem to be making that point in defense of the 6.5cm. There's no need to defend your 6.5s if you like them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Elk Hunting
6.5 CM, 6.5 PRC Enough/Effective for Elk?
Top