Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Hog Hunting
55gr vs 77gr 5.56
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="snox801" data-source="post: 3008738" data-attributes="member: 54383"><p>They are a bit soft from the factory. But I've found the opposite of you. Two holes always seem to do better. If you are just removing pests. A hole all the way through is much better than a varmit round. Heck deer have run off with those if hit in the shoulder. </p><p></p><p> Do .223 work yep, cheaper yep. But are they better than a 6.5 grendel. Nope not even close. I ran my .223 for many years but it's not even in the same ballpark as a 6.5 Grendel for putting down hogs. All measurable data suggests than. Energy and speed. It simply has more behind it factory or not.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="snox801, post: 3008738, member: 54383"] They are a bit soft from the factory. But I’ve found the opposite of you. Two holes always seem to do better. If you are just removing pests. A hole all the way through is much better than a varmit round. Heck deer have run off with those if hit in the shoulder. Do .223 work yep, cheaper yep. But are they better than a 6.5 grendel. Nope not even close. I ran my .223 for many years but it’s not even in the same ballpark as a 6.5 Grendel for putting down hogs. All measurable data suggests than. Energy and speed. It simply has more behind it factory or not. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Hog Hunting
55gr vs 77gr 5.56
Top