Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
The Basics, Starting Out
.300 Ultra Mag vs. 7mm Ultra Mag
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="remingtonman_25_06" data-source="post: 100572" data-attributes="member: 1403"><p>In a 26" tube, I dont think the 300 RUM can push the 240g to a significant velocity to make it that great. It seems to do better with either the 210g vld or 220g smk at a little higher velocity while not losing to much in the BC department. Now if you can push that big 240g a little faster, it would probly be hands down better, but for regular 26" barrel, I think the 220g is the heaviest to go. Doesn't richard make a 225g ULD?? That bullet is said to rival the 240g smk for BC and should get going at 3000fps out of a 26" tube. Very good ballistics.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="remingtonman_25_06, post: 100572, member: 1403"] In a 26" tube, I dont think the 300 RUM can push the 240g to a significant velocity to make it that great. It seems to do better with either the 210g vld or 220g smk at a little higher velocity while not losing to much in the BC department. Now if you can push that big 240g a little faster, it would probly be hands down better, but for regular 26" barrel, I think the 220g is the heaviest to go. Doesn't richard make a 225g ULD?? That bullet is said to rival the 240g smk for BC and should get going at 3000fps out of a 26" tube. Very good ballistics. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
The Basics, Starting Out
.300 Ultra Mag vs. 7mm Ultra Mag
Top