Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
.300 H&H Mag vs. .300 Win Mag in a magnum action
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greyfox" data-source="post: 1003418" data-attributes="member: 10291"><p>I own both and they are accurate shooters when hand loaded with traditionally designed bullets, and will produce similar accuracy and velocity. When loading the long, heavy VLD's which can require that your bullets be loaded closer to the lands, the H&H in the older Model 70 chamber could be problematic. Brass for the H&H is harder to find. While both can work, for serious shooting/hunting at long range, I would go with the 300WM. IMO..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greyfox, post: 1003418, member: 10291"] I own both and they are accurate shooters when hand loaded with traditionally designed bullets, and will produce similar accuracy and velocity. When loading the long, heavy VLD's which can require that your bullets be loaded closer to the lands, the H&H in the older Model 70 chamber could be problematic. Brass for the H&H is harder to find. While both can work, for serious shooting/hunting at long range, I would go with the 300WM. IMO.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
.300 H&H Mag vs. .300 Win Mag in a magnum action
Top