Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
270wsm vs 7 rem mag
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MarkA" data-source="post: 1631947" data-attributes="member: 5220"><p>I just ran volume check on RL26 vs Retumbo & 7977 at 73 grain weight.</p><p></p><p>RL 26 = 4.891 cc's</p><p></p><p>7977 = 5.161 cc's or + 5% approx</p><p></p><p>Retumbo = 5.263 cc's + 7% approx</p><p></p><p>If load is 70 grain Retumbo that should equal same volume as near 75 grain of RL26.</p><p></p><p>So RL 26 is denser than either Retumbo or 7977.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MarkA, post: 1631947, member: 5220"] I just ran volume check on RL26 vs Retumbo & 7977 at 73 grain weight. RL 26 = 4.891 cc's 7977 = 5.161 cc's or + 5% approx Retumbo = 5.263 cc's + 7% approx If load is 70 grain Retumbo that should equal same volume as near 75 grain of RL26. So RL 26 is denser than either Retumbo or 7977. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
270wsm vs 7 rem mag
Top