Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
243 1:10 Heaviest Bullet?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zerk" data-source="post: 1325049" data-attributes="member: 84595"><p>I've never seen a manual cite higher than book loads.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p><p>After my first post saying Hornady, which uses Hogdon data, I thought, and Lymann, lacking, I did post manufacturers that cite it. </p><p></p><p>Which is interesting, reloading manuals don't, but the people who sell the powder say it can. Though I will take them at their word, what they are trying to sell does it.</p><p></p><p>Hogdon also lists 110 grain 30-06, for over 3400. I am curious if there is a disadvantage to going with 30-06, if you want light and fast. Maybe to big of exit hole if you want hide. 243 is on higher side taking pelts too, according to some, but not others.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't load 110 on my 30-06s, just cause I like leaving my scopes set and ready for deer hunting.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>I do enjoy shooting my 243. It is actually heavier than my 30-06s, with a medium barrel.</p><p></p><p>I am working on 100 grain loads for deer, to have as a back up, or extra gun.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zerk, post: 1325049, member: 84595"] I've never seen a manual cite higher than book loads.:D After my first post saying Hornady, which uses Hogdon data, I thought, and Lymann, lacking, I did post manufacturers that cite it. Which is interesting, reloading manuals don't, but the people who sell the powder say it can. Though I will take them at their word, what they are trying to sell does it. Hogdon also lists 110 grain 30-06, for over 3400. I am curious if there is a disadvantage to going with 30-06, if you want light and fast. Maybe to big of exit hole if you want hide. 243 is on higher side taking pelts too, according to some, but not others. I don't load 110 on my 30-06s, just cause I like leaving my scopes set and ready for deer hunting.:D I do enjoy shooting my 243. It is actually heavier than my 30-06s, with a medium barrel. I am working on 100 grain loads for deer, to have as a back up, or extra gun. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
243 1:10 Heaviest Bullet?
Top